Larry and I were listening to Crrow777’s podcast as he interviewed Kurt Kallenback. Kurt is a man who claims that the institutional routine of cutting the baby’s cord as soon as it is born, recording the baby’s birth as its first day of existence, and then discarding or doing who knows what with the cord and placenta, takes away our divine rights as a human person. Kurt and Crrow777 talked about how in South Korea, traditional age-counting custom considers every person 1 year old at birth and adds another year when the calendar hits Jan. 1, meaning a child born on Dec. 31 turns 2 the next day. And how this way of counting age was a more natural and empowering one.
His logic and theories were too far out even for me. But for some reason, what he was saying, the energy behind what he was saying, was resonant. In other words, it felt like he was paranoid and assigning blame and intent for these actions that did not belong together but the picture at the end made some sense.
I don’t know enough about Kurt Kallenback to talk about him as a person, or even comment on most of the stuff he said in that interview as the majority was a deep dive into victim/aggressor paradigms that made us all powerless and helpless. I found his insights fascinating because they were out there into the stratosphere of what we call “normal”. And whenever I come across a person like that, I take it as an opportunity to expand my awareness into something that might prove to be interesting.
Most of his talk was about how energetically and symbolically (and maybe legally, unsure about that bit), he took back those 9 months of life from conception to birth that had been taken away from him. According to him, those 9 months of life had been taken away by severing the umbilical cord before the placenta was born and had given all its energy to the baby, and then registering his existence from the moment of birth, not conception. When he took back those 9 months, he became complete, more powerful and able. And his severed part, the umbilical cord and placenta, was no longer claimable by the state.
I wanted to give a summary of what I understood from the Crrow777 interview, and I hope I have given him a correct representation.
The reason I want to give him correct representation and also bring him to our collective awareness is because there is something inherently true about the denial of existence before birth causing a lack of sovereignty and power.
How do I know this?
Well, as many of you know, when I hear something interesting, I try it out. I sat in the truck while we listened to Kurt talk, I closed my eyes, felt into that moment of birth, my birth, then traveled back to conception and claimed those months too. I claimed to have come into existence as a singular being from the moment of conception.
The change in my field, power and energy was instant. It was a “wow” moment.
Try it!!
I then told Larry about it and he tried it too. He also reported a change.
Of course, being someone who knows that people have had more than one life, and that not only the soul incarnates but that the body also has multiple lifetimes, I then went back to the moment of conception for the soul into physical reality, and for the body’s own conception in the Universe.
I was blown away.
All I can say to describe this energy is like suddenly I felt at peace. Suddenly all fears and worries and stresses and frustrations fell away.
Not only that, but my awareness became more acute, more accurate, more capable.
I was like, “OMG we have to talk about this on Driving to the Rez, Larry!”
“Yes!” He said, “send me a text so we don’t forget.”
I picked up the phone and wrote: “Claim the Entirety of Your Incarnation”.
PS: Continue to the in-depth exploration of this article in our podcast.
i disagree with this concept of completely reclaiming one's incarnation down to the moment of conception. i think it could even be seen as part of what the globalists are attempting to do -- to first deny the essential natural experience of gestation in the womb of your mother, and then replace it with their techno-womb idea where everyone begins their indoctrination of existing only through the auspices of Big Brother.
Carlos Castaneda's writings on the sorcery practices of the Toltecs, reveal how a woman has many more energetic connections than a man, those extra ones being in her womb. It is these energetic connections that support the foetus, until just before the baby's birth, when the Body Elemental, which has made an agreement with the incarnating soul, takes over, to provide support of the body's autonomic functions. It also serves as an "Unconscious" for the person's psyche, since our world is a Light-Dark reality, and the psyche needs a repository to temporarily store dark and traumatic memories, until they can be properly processed, this whole process being necessary until the psyche (in an ideal situation) brings itself into individuation.
While we are in our mother's womb, we are not yet part of the the world with its rules of consensual reality, even though the soul has made a commitment to its future life there, and the mother has also made one to support you, not just while in her womb, but in preparing and empowering your psyche at each new stage of development in your future life. There are a multitude of stages after successive transitions, involved in building a fully empowered "Incarnation" including what the Jewish tradition honours at the Bar and Bat Mizpah at age 13 -- which is a separation from the energetic field of your parents. Until then you, in effect, utilize the personality structure of your parents, as well as their ancestral lineages.
Earlier in life, our psyche is 'set up' for attachment to objects of nourishment and at a later stage, to release those attachments towards a more self-empowered experience. This is how the child learns love without attachment. Around age 7, our Self undergoes a shift, and we exchange our Self's ability to connect with the spiritual world, for its focus on the outer world of society. In an enlightened society however, there would not be such a sharp distinction between outer and inner realities.
Also the transition of birth itself is a very important one. My landlady is an alternative midwife and claims that anyone who has been birthed by caesarian, has not really been born. Indeed, Arthur Janov in the 1970s created Primal Therapy, where re-experiencing without restraint, all the movements, sensations and emotions of one's birth (which are still stored by the Body Elemental), can act as a re-set of a traumatized and disempowered psyche. According to Janov, releasing the "primal scream" the body still holds -- and which underlies all the later emotional issues of the person -- acts a basic empowerment function -- which can be utilized at any time by the person. So it's not that we can just become automatically "empowered" per se, but we are empowered through having the ability of calling in our body's natural resources, as well as our mind's and soul's wisdom, to more and more situations in life.
Also i learned from a doula, how there are so many aspects to a natural birth and what the medical system has discarded as irrelevant, are actually important parts of the process, i.e. after birth, the baby is covered with a substance important for their protection which should not be washed off. i have also heard, as Kurtis said, that the umbilical cord should not be cut until the placenta has been birthed, and this can possibly relate to all the energetic connections that the Toltecs know exist in the womb, and which must be properly disconnected through the birth of the placenta, rather than the premature cutting of the chord.
Also the civil and personal rights movements of the 1960s and 70s, established certain truths both spiritual and legal, one being women's inalienable right of "Our Bodies Ourselves." Of course this a truth for every person, but with a woman, it means she has full authority over her reproductive functions, including abortion, and no one can interfere, even if they disagree with her particular choice. Basically it legally affirms a spiritual truth already there -- that in an incarnation the mother has full authority in the gestation and birth process. Even astrology takes the moment of birth, rather than conception, as the point where planetary influences begin -- and this seems in line with the fact that the Body Elemental only comes in to join with the foetus' soul just before birth. And Rudolf Steiner's claim is that it is through the Double (aka Body Elemental) that planetary and stellar influences are apprehended. So in regards to self-empowerment, each person has to also acknowledge the agreement their soul has made with their mother's soul -- of maintaining the gestation and birthing process and then providing love and support during childhood. Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending how you look at it) the souls of parents and those of their children are usually bound together through karmic agreements, which colour (or assist in resolving (again the dichotomy)) -- the empowerment process of all concerned.
This position of staged empowerment may be seen as being contrary to an idea of full empowerment at every point in one's incarnation, but i feel it reflects the natural cycles of incarnation on this planet. There is much we still don't know about incarnation and empowerment, including how the relationship between soul and Source figures in. Why do those who have a specific mission for the planet, benefit in taking over a declined incarnation of another (as in a "walk-in") even at the point just before birth, as it would not provide the benefit of 'walking-in' to an already established life in adulthood, from which the mission could then immediately begin ? All it would seem to provide, is a head start of 9 months. Perhaps a walk-in at birth, somehow prevents a loss of connection to Source that normally happens during the full course of the gestation period ? And thus this maintenance of connection to Source, could be the special empowerment it provides to a walk-in done at birth, rather than coming in naturally at conception and losing it ? But in such a situation, of walking-in at birth, where one has not even undergone the full in-womb period, it would seem unfounded to lay claim to "empowerment from point of conception" later. At best this would be like appropriation of a 3rd party agreement -- one that the declining soul had made with the mother's soul to incarnate.
Wow! Speaking of going to Noah and back! What a powerful podcast and claim